Digging into Amarin's REDUCE-IT, including new data presented during the American College of Cardiology’s scientific sessionTicker(s): AMRN
Name: Dr Michael H. Davidson - MD
Institution: University of Chicago
- Professor of Medicine and Director of the Lipid Clinic at the University of Chicago & founding board member of the National Lipid Association.
- Has conducted over 1000 clinical trials, published more than 300 medical journal articles and written three books on Lipidology.
- Research background encompasses both pharmaceutical and nutritional clinical trials including extensive research on statins, novel lipid-lowering drugs, and omega-3 fatty acids.
- Co-founder of Omthera Pharma — a small biotech that developed a competing fish-oil-derived drug, Epanova, later acquired by AstraZeneca.
Join & add your own questions via the orange "Add a Question" button below!Added By: c_admin
Why do you think Vascepa succeeded here when other fish-oil derived medicines have not?
What role should Vascepa play in clinical care after the REDUCE-IT study?
Do you think the benefits of these medicines will be limited to those with elevated triglycerides?
Could you please talk about Amarin's IP in relation to EPANOVA and what happened in the court case filed by Amarin that kept AZN from selling Epanova and if you think Amarin's pure EPA formulation is generally defensible from OTC high strength supplements trying to leverage Amarin's R-IT R&D spend?Added By: user282f0563
There seems to be a perception that the STRENGTH trial outcomes are important to give validation to the REDUCE-IT data. But aren't Epanova and Vascepa quite different chemically? Could you talk about this chemical difference especially in terms of EPA and DHA content? Also, doesn't the JELIS study already give some validity to the REDUCE-IT data, considering both were pure EPA products?Added By: sentiv
It has been cited that 50-70mm people in the US
have CV risk factors beyond LDL. How do you think about the size/scale of the market
opportunity for CV risk reduction beyond controlling LDL, and where does EPA
fit into this picture?
Were you surprised that the strong (25%+) relative
risk reduction demonstrated in REDUCE-IT trial was observed across all baseline TG groups;
including the lowest (81-190 mg/dl, median of 163) tertile? What are the
implications of these “TG independent” results, especially with respect to
overall patient opportunity and physician prescribing habits?
Given the significant reduction in
cardiovascular events seen in both REDUCE-IT and JELIS, coupled with its
attractive safety profile, is there any reason to believe that EPA in adjunct
with Statins should not be the Standard of Care going forward? What is the
process and/or timeline for updating guideline from organizations such as
National Lipid Association, AHA/ACC, etc.
Out of the almost 40mm people in the US taking
statins, what percentage do you think have additional CV risk factor and could
benefit from using EPA as an adjunct therapy? What will it take for EPA therapy
to significantly penetrate this opportunity?
How important are cardiovascular outcome trials to FDA? What is the likely impact on physician prescribing habits given Vascepa's position as the first drug in the market with a successful trial, published results in NEJM/JACC, and presentations at AHA/ACC, etc.
How persuasive were Vascepa data presented at ACC showing further reduction in second/third heart attacks?
What do you think the relative importance of DHA and EPA are in determining whether a fish-oil-derived medicine is effective?
Could you explain the rationale between the creation of Epanova, in which you played a key role, and the design of the STRENGTH study?
Will the outcome of the STRENGTH study change physician perceptions of Vascepa? In which ways?Added By: adamfeuerstein
From a user: "If the same study would be done using a highly purified fish oil like the one I take from Life Extension Foundation called Clearly EPA/DHA with a dose in 4 capsules of EPA 1500 mg and DHA 1000mg,and without the change they have to make in the natural molecule in order to get a patent, how do you know that you wouldn’t get the same or better result with the natural form ? If someone does that study this drug with the altered molecule would suddenly lose value. The other important question is: What are the side effects of this altered molecule?"Added By: joe_mccann
How would you see Lipid Management Guidelines could be impacted based on results of REDUCE-IT trial?; what will be the potential effect on Lipid Management for patients with higher CV risk, high LDL and normal TG levels?Added By: cuicas
Expert research benefits investors by giving them timely access to unbiased real world perspectives on highly specialized topics. Slingshot Insights' crowdfunded model makes this access available at a fraction of the cost of other expert networks.