This project has been flagged by a community member as inappropriate due to reason below.*

Expert Interview

Slingshot members are talking to an expert! The topic is:

Analyzing the Phase 3 MAPLE-HCM Study Results for Aficamten in Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy from Cytokinetics

Ticker(s): CYTK

Who's the expert?

A cardiologist specializing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and advanced heart failure, with experience in clinical trials involving myosin inhibitors and management of patients with obstructive and non-obstructive HCM. The expert should also have familiarity with evolving guideline recommendations and the long-term implications of shifting away from beta-blockers as the first-line therapy.

Interview Questions
Q1.

The MAPLE-HCM trial demonstrated a statistically significant least-squares mean difference of +2.3 mL/kg/min in peak oxygen uptake (pVO₂) for aficamten versus metoprolol at 24 weeks (p<0.0001). How clinically meaningful is this improvement in exercise capacity for patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q2.

Beta-blockers have been the cornerstone of obstructive HCM management for over six decades, yet aficamten demonstrated superior efficacy across nearly all endpoints. Do these results suggest a potential paradigm shift in first-line treatment strategies for oHCM?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q3.

More than half (51%) of aficamten-treated patients experienced an improvement of at least one NYHA functional class, compared to 26% on metoprolol (p<0.001). How impactful is this degree of functional improvement when considering day-to-day patient outcomes?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q4.

Aficamten led to an 81% reduction in NT-proBNP levels and significant improvements in left atrial volume index, suggesting potential benefits on cardiac remodeling and diastolic dysfunction. How do these findings translate into long-term risk modification for patients with obstructive HCM?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q5.

Despite demonstrating strong hemodynamic effects, aficamten showed similar rates of adverse events compared to metoprolol, with only 4.5% requiring dose down-titration versus nearly 30% on metoprolol. How do these safety outcomes affect your confidence in using aficamten broadly in clinical practice?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q6.

The primary endpoint benefit was consistent across all prespecified subgroups, including newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve patients. Does this suggest aficamten could be considered earlier in the treatment algorithm, even before beta-blockers in some cases?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q7.

With the FDA currently reviewing the NDA for aficamten and a PDUFA target action date of December 26, 2025, what are your expectations for regulatory approval, and how could this approval reshape the competitive treatment landscape for obstructive HCM?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q8.

Beyond MAPLE-HCM and SEQUOIA-HCM, aficamten is also being evaluated in trials for non-obstructive HCM, pediatric oHCM, and open-label extension studies. How might these ongoing programs expand its clinical relevance and position aficamten as a cornerstone therapy across the entire HCM spectrum?

Added By: slingshot_insights

Are You Interested In These Questions?

Slingshot Insights Explained
114Days Left to Join Project

Expert research benefits investors by giving them timely access to unbiased real world perspectives on highly specialized topics. Slingshot Insights' crowdfunded model makes this access available at a fraction of the cost of other expert networks.

Reason

*Slingshot Insights provides access to information, not investment advice. We work to support you and facilitate access to experts; however we are not responsible for monitoring calls for the disclosure of MNPI. You should obtain financial, legal and tax advice from your qualified and licensed advisers before deciding to invest in any security.