This project has been flagged by a community member as inappropriate due to reason below.*

Expert Interview

Slingshot members are talking to an expert! The topic is:

A Second Opinion: Dissecting the data released from the BEACON Phase 1b/2a clinical trial of briquilimab in adult participants with chronic spontaneous urticaria.

Ticker(s): JSPR

Who's the expert?

Institution: Florida Center For Allergy & Asthma Care 

  • Specialist in Adult & Pediatric Allergy and Diplomate of the American Board of Allergy & Immunology.
  • Currently manages ~100 patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria.

Interview Questions
Q1.

What are the current treatment options for CSU, how effective are they, and how many patients require alternatives beyond Xolair? How does Dupixent compare to Xolair, and what impact might its FDA approval have on the treatment landscape?

Added By: max_admin
Q2.

What are your thoughts on remibrutinib and BTK inhibitors in CSU treatment, and how do they compare to Xolair in terms of efficacy and placebo-adjusted effects? Will dermatologists be more inclined to adopt remibrutinib over other options?

Added By: max_admin
Q3.

How do KIT inhibitors compare in efficacy to existing CSU treatments, and does briquilimab show a meaningful safety advantage over barzolvolimab? How does briquilimab’s shorter half-life impact its potential benefits and safety profile?

Added By: max_admin
Q4.

What do you think about the seesawing effect observed in briquilimab's UAS7 reduction, and should efficacy be measured further into the dosing interval? Could a loading dose solve the issue of rebound effects, and will side effects like neutropenia and hair color changes affect its adoption?

Added By: max_admin
Q5.

Where do you see anti-KIT therapies fitting into the CSU treatment landscape, and will briquilimab be used primarily for Xolair-refractory patients? Could neutropenia concerns lead to required monitoring, and how excited are you about briquilimab’s potential? Could the oral KIT inhibitor from Blueprint outperform antibody-based KIT inhibitors?

Added By: max_admin
Q6.

What level of safety signals / adverse events is acceptable given the efficacy observed with antibody-based KIT inhibitors so far?

Added By: user23eb7a0d

Are You Interested In These Questions?

Slingshot Insights Explained

Expert research benefits investors by giving them timely access to unbiased real world perspectives on highly specialized topics. Slingshot Insights' crowdfunded model makes this access available at a fraction of the cost of other expert networks.

Reason

*Slingshot Insights provides access to information, not investment advice. We work to support you and facilitate access to experts; however we are not responsible for monitoring calls for the disclosure of MNPI. You should obtain financial, legal and tax advice from your qualified and licensed advisers before deciding to invest in any security.