This project has been flagged by a community member as inappropriate due to reason below.*

Expert Interview

Slingshot members are talking to an expert! The topic is:

Examining the potential of Syndax' Revumenib (SNDX-5613) in treating mNPM1 or mixed lineage leukemia rearranged (MLLr) relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute leukemias

Ticker(s): SNDX

Who's the expert?

Institution: Stanford

  • Associate professor of medicine at Stanford. 
  • Treats 25-30 patients with NPM1 mutated AML and 10 mutated acute leukemias.
  • Research interest focuses on the development of novel therapeutic regimens for patients with acute leukemia, with special interest in the development of novel therapeutic strategies for patients with acute myeloid leukemia. 
  • Leader in several institutional investigator initiated clinical trials, active investigator in collaborative multi-institutional clinical studies and an active member of the SWOG acute leukemia panel.

Interview Questions
Q1.

Roughly how many patients with mixed lineage leukemia rearranged (MLLr) relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute leukemias do you currently manage?

Added By: c_admin
Q2.

On a scale from 1-10 (10 being extremely excited) where would you rate your level of excitement for Revumenib (SNDX-5613)?

Added By: c_admin
Q3.

What percent of your patients with acute leukemia are MLLr or mNPM1, and what percentages in the relapsed/refractory setting specifically?

Added By: yusuff_admin
Q4.

Please explain the Menin-MLL1 pathway as it relates to MLL fusion proteins and what role this plays in acute leukemias?

Added By: yusuff_admin
Q5.

What should the proposed activity of SNDX-5613 (blocking interaction of MLL1 and menin) accomplish in leukemic cells to combat the disease?

Added By: yusuff_admin
Q6.

What can you tell us about genetic testing in acute leukemias? How routine is it, are these specific mutations/rearrangements being looked for, and how successful at finding them if they are there?  

Added By: yusuff_admin
Q7.

Since no drug for MLLr specifically, do they still look for this?

Added By: yusuff_admin
Q8.

In the 3 settings of MLLr ALL/MPAL, MLLr AML, or mNPM1 AML do you expect the drug to work equally well, or are there differences in how it should work in each?

Added By: yusuff_admin
Q9.

Updated data in Phase 1: ORR 55% (n=28 of 51), and 31% MRD-negative rate (16/51).   ORR in MLLr = 61% (23 of 38) and NPM1c 38% (5 of 13). Overall 24% CR/CRh rate with mutations, and no discontinuations   (23% and 24% CR/CRh in the two mutation types) 50% having longer than 6 months response. What is your interpretation of these data? Is this exciting? So-so? Not good enough?

Added By: yusuff_admin
Q10.

Median of four prior therapies, including 42% who received a prior stem cell transplant and 59% who received prior venetoclax, were dosed: How does the efficacy look within the context of this patient type?  

Added By: yusuff_admin
Q11.

On safety, they saw >5% SAEs of QT prolongation, anemia, and differentiation syndrome - And at RecommendedPhase2Dose, 7% had QT prolongation: Can you explain these in terms of acute leukemias and are these common side effects of effective drugs in this space, or is this unique to this drug or otherwise something to be hesitant about that might prevent the drug's usage if it should eventually be approved?   How much do these side effects matter in the context of AML and developing this drug further including in more upfront settings?

Added By: yusuff_admin
Q12.

Can you explain the difference between response rates on CR/CRh (24%), CRp (14%), and CRi/MLFS (18%) and how important the non-CR/CRh responses are?

Added By: yusuff_admin
Q13.

Phase 2 pivotal portion of this trial has CR/CRh as primary endpoint with DOR and OS secondaries. What is the bar for FDA approval on these endpoints? And what is the bar on these metrics as something you would be excited about?

Added By: yusuff_admin
Q14.

Future direction: planning to develop in frontline in combo with venetoclax + azacitodine. Does this have potential in your view?

Added By: yusuff_admin
Q15.

Competition: Another menin inhibitor, Kura Oncology's KO-539, had a clinical hold based on a patient death. Is there any important ways in which these two molecules differ from each other? Any other menin inhibitors being developed that look interesting?

Added By: yusuff_admin
Q16.

Big Pharma has not pursued this target to this point? If not, why not? Could this data from SNDX-5613 get them interested in this menin inhibitor arena?

Added By: yusuff_admin

Are You Interested In These Questions?

Slingshot Insights Explained

Expert research benefits investors by giving them timely access to unbiased real world perspectives on highly specialized topics. Slingshot Insights' crowdfunded model makes this access available at a fraction of the cost of other expert networks.

Reason

*Slingshot Insights provides access to information, not investment advice. We work to support you and facilitate access to experts; however we are not responsible for monitoring calls for the disclosure of MNPI. You should obtain financial, legal and tax advice from your qualified and licensed advisers before deciding to invest in any security.