This project has been flagged by a community member as inappropriate due to reason below.*

Expert Interview

Slingshot members are talking to an expert! The topic is:

Discussing Arcutis' roflumilast vs. Dermavant's tapinatof for the treatment of psoriasis

Ticker(s): ARQT, ROIV

Who's the expert?

Institution: Private Practice

  • Board-Certified dermatologist practicing cosmetic, medical, surgical and pediatric dermatology.
  • Treats 5 patients with DEB and 100 patients with atopic dermatitis each month.
  • Served as a sub-investigator for 10 randomized clinical drug trials for atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, systemic lupus erythematosus and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; investigator for Dupixent’s Phase 2 AD trials.

Interview Questions
Q1.

Can you please describe where topicals fit in when you treat psoriasis including an estimate of the percentage of the psoriasis patients in your practice who are on a topical.  

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q2.

What percentage of patients on biologics or oral therapies are also using a topical?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q3.

Topical steroids can cause stretch marks, thinning, spider veins, and reactions with withdrawal. Broadly, what is your view on topical steroids in psoriasis and how enthusiastic are you about the availability of new topical non steroidal options?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q4.

How do you view roflumilast and tapinarof in terms of efficacy? Do you see them as differentiated from each other in terms of efficacy?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q5.

For roflumilast, it appears to be very effective on knees and elbows? Do you view this an important product feature ?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q6.

The data set for tapinarof’s phase 3’s had an efficacy endpoint at 12 weeks vs roflumilast being an 8 week endpoint. It also appears at the 8 week mark, roflumilast topical is more effective than Otezla. Do you view a quicker onset as being an important factor when prescribing?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q7.

Folliculits was 20.6% and 15.7% in the pivotal trials for tapinarof but the discontinuation rates due to folliculitis were 1.8% and .9%. How do you view the incidence of folliculitis in this context?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q8.

About 70 percent of roflumilast patients reported a 4 or more point reduction in itch. For tapinarof, it was about 60 %. Do you view this is a differentiator from existing therapies or a complaint patients have when treated with current treatments?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q9.

Do you believe tapinarof and/or roflumilast can displace generic steroids as first line treatments for psoriasis?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q10.

Roflumilast patients had a 3.5 and 2.8% rate of diarrhea in ph 3. Would you consider using roflumilast in patients who can’t tolerate Otezla due to the SE profile (21% nausea and 18 % diarrhea) ?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q11.

How important is the ability to write one prescription (roflumilast or tapinarof) that patients can use on all body areas w disease including intertriginous areas?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q12.

  1. Tapinarof and roflumilast are creams but roflumilast also comes in a foam formulation for scalp psoriasis and seborrheic dermatitis.   What are your thoughts on the importance of the availability of a foam and how would it impact your prescribing?  

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q13.

Is there a patient type you feel is better suited for tapinarof or for roflumilast or it essentially the same patient ?  

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q14.

How do you view roflumilast and tapinarof when compared to combination products such as Wynzora and Duobrii?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q15.

Would you consider roflumilast and tapinarof only in new patients or can you describe scenarios where you could see switching a patient from other treatments?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q16.

Is pricing/access something that impacts your prescribing in psoriasis? How difficult is it for patients to get the meds your prescribe for psoriasis through their insurers.  If a product requires utilization steps vs a therapy with no pre-authorization, how important a factor is that in your prescribing?

Added By: slingshot_insights
Q17.

Is there anything about these products or the psoriasis market that you feel we missed in our discussion or should be focusing on? Are there any other players you feel could be disruptive?

Added By: slingshot_insights

Are You Interested In These Questions?

Slingshot Insights Explained

Expert research benefits investors by giving them timely access to unbiased real world perspectives on highly specialized topics. Slingshot Insights' crowdfunded model makes this access available at a fraction of the cost of other expert networks.

Reason

*Slingshot Insights provides access to information, not investment advice. We work to support you and facilitate access to experts; however we are not responsible for monitoring calls for the disclosure of MNPI. You should obtain financial, legal and tax advice from your qualified and licensed advisers before deciding to invest in any security.