This project has been flagged by a community member as inappropriate due to reason below.*

Expert Interview

Slingshot members are talking to an expert! The topic is:

Reviewing MedDay Pharmaceuticals's Phase IIb/3 Data For MD1003 in Not-Active Progressive MS, and How it Affects the Market Potential of Roche's (RHHBY) Breakthrough Therapy Ocrelizumab for Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Ticker(s): RHHBY, MedDay Pharmaceuticals

Who's the expert?

An expert with significant experience treating patients with both active and not-active primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS), who is familiar with the recent data from MedDay's Phase IIb/3 trial. He or she will also have knowledge of the data for ocrelizumab, and the regulatory process for MS drugs.

Interview Questions
Q1.

Can you describe your experience treating patients with both active and not-active PPMS, and what your typical plan for treatment looks like?

Added By: pjloria
Q2.

How does your course of treatment differ for patients who have active PPMS versus those with not-active PPMS? What drugs are currently used and how effective are they? What is done outside of treatment with drugs and how effective are these methods?

Added By: pjloria
Q3.

Can you discuss the design of the trails for each drug thus far, and what the results are suggesting? 

Added By: pjloria
Q4.

There are no currently approved treatments for PPMS, but there are several disease-modifying therapies that work by reducing inflammation in the central nervous system. The problem with these treatments is that MS is characterized by nerve degeneration and not inflammation. Can you discuss the mechanism of action of MD1003 and ocrelizumab, and how they differ from current therapies? 

Added By: pjloria
Q5.

The primary endpoint of MedDay's MS-SPI study was the proportion of patients with either improvement of the Expanded Disability Scale (EDSS) or the timed 25-foot walk (TW25) after nine months and confirmed at 12 months. Can you discuss the validity of this endpoint and others used in this trial and Roche's trials?  

Added By: pjloria
Q6.

The primary endpoint was met with 12.6% of patients in the MD1003 arm demonstrating a confirmed reversion of progression, compared to zero patients in the placebo group. Is this number clinically relevant, and how does it compare to the results for ocrelizumab thus far? 

Added By: pjloria
Q7.

In their MS-on study MedDay wanted to see whether MD1003 could improve patients who are progressively becoming more disabled, or decrease recovery time after an incomplete remission of an acute relapse. They failed to meet their primary endpoint. Can you discuss the design and results of this trial, and how it compares to what you've seen from ocrelizumab?

Added By: pjloria
Q8.

Was there anything else noteworthy in MedDay's recent data release? Can you summarize the safety and efficacy results for both drugs? 

Added By: pjloria
Q9.

Given the current information, how do you view the chances of approval for MD1003 and for ocrelizumab? 

Added By: pjloria
Q10.

If MD1003 gets approved in not-active PPMS, will MedDay try to expand their indication into active PPMS? Would it be able to compete with ocrelizumab in active PPMS? 

Added By: pjloria
Q11.

Assuming both drugs get approved, what percentage of existing not-active PPMS patients will switch to MD1003 and how many will switch to ocrelizumab? What percentage of active PPMS patients would switch to MD1003 and how many would switch to ocrelizumab? What percentage of new PPMS patients do you expect would use each drug?

Added By: pjloria
Q12.

How safe and effective are current treatment options, and how do MD1003 and ocrelizumab compare?

Added By: pjloria

Are You Interested In These Questions?

Slingshot Insights Explained

Expert research benefits investors by giving them timely access to unbiased real world perspectives on highly specialized topics. Slingshot Insights' crowdfunded model makes this access available at a fraction of the cost of other expert networks.

Reason

*Slingshot Insights provides access to information, not investment advice. We work to support you and facilitate access to experts; however we are not responsible for monitoring calls for the disclosure of MNPI. You should obtain financial, legal and tax advice from your qualified and licensed advisers before deciding to invest in any security.