This project has been flagged by a community member as inappropriate due to reason below.*

Expert Interview

Slingshot members are talking to an expert! The topic is:

Assessing Tenapanor's safety/ efficacy profile in IBS-C ahead of the PDUFA date September 12, 2019

Ticker(s): ARDX

Who's the expert?

A Gastroenterologist with knowledge of Ardelyx’s upcoming pipeline in IBS-C and with experience in the space.

Interview Questions
Q1.

Please tell us about your clinical practice, background in treating IBS-C and research in the space. How many patients do you treat, and what is your preferred first-line therapy?

Added By: catalin_admin
Q2.

How much of a need for a new treatment is there in this space?

Added By: catalin_admin
Q3.

How does tenapanor’s inhibition of the sodium transporter NHE3 mechanism of action work to reduce sodium uptake from the gut, and why is that important in IBS-C?

Added By: catalin_admin
Q4.

How efficient are Efgartigimod/ SYNT001/ PRN10008 at binding FcRn and blocking IgG recycling/ increasing IgG clearance vs its competition?

Added By: catalin_admin
Q5.

What’s your take on the compliance rate of tenapanor in the t3 long term trial at 98%,the 2.1% discontinuation rate, (of which 1.7% due to diarrhea), and the most common adverse event being diarrhea at 9.2%. Is it high/low, vs other trials you’ve seen in IBS-C?

Added By: catalin_admin
Q6.

An older trial from 2017 reported greater than placebo rates for diarrhea (16.0% vs. 3.7%), flatulence (3.1% vs. 1.0%), nasopharyngitis (4.4% vs. 3.7%) and abdominal distension (3.4% vs. 0.3%). The placebo adjusted discontinuation rate due to diarrhea was 5.8 percent. What could account for the differences in that trial vs the long term safety trial?

Added By: catalin_admin
Q7.

In a phase 3 multicenter U.S. trial with 593 patients, data showed the combined response consisting of at least a 30% drop from baseline in reported abdominal pain and an increase of at least one complete spontaneous bowel movement per week for 6 of the first 12 weeks of treatment. This combined response occurred in 37% of patients treated with tenapanor at a dosage of 50 mg oral, compared with a 24% rate among the placebo-control patients. What’s the significance/impact of this data?

Added By: catalin_admin
Q8.

Any comments on the pill burden of tenapanor vs other oral treatments? Is the dose significantly lower with tenapanor?

Added By: catalin_admin

Are You Interested In These Questions?

Slingshot Insights Explained

Expert research benefits investors by giving them timely access to unbiased real world perspectives on highly specialized topics. Slingshot Insights' crowdfunded model makes this access available at a fraction of the cost of other expert networks.

Reason

*Slingshot Insights provides access to information, not investment advice. We work to support you and facilitate access to experts; however we are not responsible for monitoring calls for the disclosure of MNPI. You should obtain financial, legal and tax advice from your qualified and licensed advisers before deciding to invest in any security.